Statistical comparison of avalanche-path-profile data from four widely separated mountain ranges (coastal Alaska, California Sierra Nevada, Colorado Rocky Mountains, and western Norway) are compared and presented in tabular form. Only unusual (approx. 100-yr return period) avalanches were compared. Inspection of the data leads to the following conclusions: (1) The avalanche paths in Norway and Alaska are larger and steeper than those sampled in Colorado and California; (2) The best regression equation for predicting the a angle developed from Norway data predicts a which is too large in Colorado, the Sierra Nevada, and coastal Alaska; (3) The extreme avalanche runout distances, as defined by the dimensionless Runout Ratio, a measure of runout distance with respect to path size, are significantly larger in California and Colorado; (4) Larger runout ratios are associated with shorter path lengths in the Colorado and Sierra Nevada data; (5) The observed differences between runout distances suggests that statistical runout equations developed in one mountain area should not be applied to other areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur I. Mears (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: