Several trimethylenemethane-type (TMM-type) dinitroxide biradicals have been prepared that differ in tert -butylaminoxylphenyl ring torsion angles by virtue of different steric demands of their “spin-protecting groups”. In addition, the synthesis of a TMM-type dinitroxide having a planar π-system is reported. The synthetic route employed for the planar TMM-type biradical is general and should therefore expand the utility of TMM-type biradicals that are susceptible to bond torsions that attenuate exchange coupling. The compounds presented are designed to be effective to map out J -coupling/conformation space in TMM-type biradicals. EPR spectroscopic parameters (hfcc and D -values) were compared to determine if their values reflected differences in conformation in the series of biradicals. Interestingly, neither N- nor H-hfcc varied within our series of biradicals/monoradicals in a regular fashion, indicating that there is no apparent relationship between N- or H-hfcc and conformation (as judged by molecular mechanics calculations). However, D -values, estimated from relative intensities of Δ m s = 1 and Δ m s = 2 transitions, are consistent with a varied degree of delocalization in the dinitroxides: smaller D -values for biradicals having smaller aryl torsions (and greater delocalization), and larger D -values for dinitroxides having greater aryl torsions (and less delocalization). All the biradicals studied, except 5 • •, exhibited linear Curie plots. The linear Curie plots are consistent with both triplet ground-states and singlet−triplet degeneracies. Interestingly, dinitroxide 6 • • exhibited a linear Curie plot, despite the lack of a π-coupling fragment. Biradical 5 • •, however, is a ground-state singlet species with the triplet lying about 140 cal/mol above the singlet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shultz et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: