Key result
Immediate hematoma after electrophysiological procedures was strongly associated with patient-reported hematomas at 14 days (OR 18.7; 95% CI 5.00-69.8; P<0.001).
Why the study?
What are the incidence and predisposing factors for groin hematoma after electrophysiological procedures?
Observational (n=251)
What are the incidence and predisposing factors for groin hematoma after electrophysiological procedures?
Immediate hematoma after electrophysiological procedures is a strong predictor of patient-reported hematoma at 2 weeks, emphasizing the importance of procedural and post-procedural care.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the incidence and predisposing factors of groin hematomas after electrophysiological (EP) procedures. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients after EP procedures (Atrial fibrillation: n = 151; Supraventricular tachycardia/Diagnostic EP: n = 82; Ventricular tachycardia: n = 18). Patients underwent manual compression for 10 min and 3 h post procedural bed rest. AF ablations were performed with INR 2-3, ACT > 300, and no protamine sulfate. Adhesive pressure dressings (APDs) were used if sheath size ≥ 10F; procedural time > 120 min; and BMI > 30. Patient-reported hematomas were recorded by a telephone follow-up after 2 weeks. RESULTS: Hematoma developed immediately in 26 patients (10%) and after 14 days significant hematoma was reported in 68 patients (27%). Regression analysis on sex, age, BMI 25, ACT 300, use of APD, sheath size and number, and complicated venous access was not associated with hematoma, either immediately after the procedure or after 14 days. Any hematoma presenting immediately after procedures was associated with patient-reported hematomas after 14 days, odds ratio 18.7 (CI 95%: 5.00-69.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Any hematoma immediately after EP procedures was the sole predictor of patient-reported hematoma after 2 weeks. Initiatives to prevent groin hematoma should focus on the procedure itself as well as post-procedural care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalsgaard et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Electrophysiological procedures (n=251). Immediate hematoma after procedure vs. No immediate hematoma was evaluated on Patient-reported hematoma after 14 days (OR 18.7, 95% CI 5.00-69.8, p=< 0.001). Immediate hematoma after electrophysiological procedures was strongly associated with patient-reported hematomas at 14 days (OR 18.7; 95% CI 5.00-69.8; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: