Key result
Long-term systolic BP variability was associated with death or cardiovascular events in CKD patients (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.51 per 5-mm Hg higher SD), whereas short-term variability was not.
Why the study?
Relationships between short- or long-term blood pressure variability and cardiovascular events have been scarcely investigated in CKD patients, and their prognostic value in this population is unknown.
Does short- and long-term systolic BP variability predict death or cardiovascular events in patients with CKD?
Cohort (n=402)
Does short- and long-term systolic BP variability predict death or cardiovascular events in patients with CKD?
Hazard Ratio: 1.24 (95% CI 1.01–1.51)
Long-term, but not short-term, systolic BP variability is associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular events in CKD patients, though it does not improve risk prediction models.
Long-term BP variability signals higher CKD risk without improving prediction; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short-term BP variability (derived from 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring) and long-term BP variability (from clinic visit to clinic visit) are directly related to risk for cardiovascular events, but these relationships have been scarcely investigated in patients with CKD, and their prognostic value in this population is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a cohort of 402 patients with CKD, we assessed associations of short- and long-term systolic BP variability with a composite end point of death or cardiovascular event. Variability was defined as the standard deviation of observed BP measurements. We further tested the prognostic value of these parameters for risk discrimination and reclassification. RESULTS: Mean ± SD short-term systolic BP variability was 12.6±3.3 mm Hg, and mean ± SD long-term systolic BP variability was 12.7±5.1 mm Hg. For short-term BP variability, 125 participants experienced the composite end point over a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.3-8.6 years). For long-term BP variability, 110 participants experienced the composite end point over a median follow-up of 3.2 years (interquartile range, 1.0-7.5 years). In adjusted analyses, long-term BP variability was significantly associated with the composite end point (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.51 per 5-mm Hg higher SD of office systolic BP), but short-term systolic BP variability was not (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.25 per 5-mm Hg higher SD of 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP). Neither estimate of BP variability improved risk discrimination or reclassification compared with a simple risk prediction model. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, long-term but not short-term systolic BP variability is related to the risk of death and cardiovascular events. However, BP variability has a limited role for prediction in CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mallamaci et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (n=402). Systolic blood pressure variability was evaluated on Composite end point of death or cardiovascular event (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.51). Long-term systolic BP variability was associated with death or cardiovascular events in CKD patients (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.51 per 5-mm Hg higher SD), whereas short-term variability was not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: