Pigeons and humans searched on a touch-screen monitor for an unmarked goal located relative to an array of landmarks presented in varied screen locations.After training with the goal centered in various square arrays of 4 landmarks, humans, but not pigeons, transferred accurately to arrays with novel elements.Humans searched in the middle of expanded arrays, whereas pigeons preserved the distance and direction to a single landmark.When trained with the goal centered below 2 identical horizontally aligned landmarks, humans responded to horizontal expansions or contractions of the array by shifting their search vertically, preserving angles from landmarks to goal.Pigeons did not adjust their search vertically.Humans trained with a single landmark adjusted search distance when landmark size was changed.Both pigeons and humans use the configuration of a landmark array, but the underlying processes seem to differ.Experimental work has demonstrated that many animal species can encode the location of an important place in terms of nearby visual landmarks (see Gallistel, 1990, and Collett, 1992, for reviews).In several investigations of landmark use, a goal was located near an array of two or more local landmarks, with a directionally stable frame of reference provided by other cues (e.g.,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spetch et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: