BACKGROUND: To determine which of atracurium or vecuronium is associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular and pulmonary events in high-risk patients, the authors administered these drugs to patients with known asthma. METHODS: Sixty patients aged 18-75 yr taking bronchodilators chronically for asthma were anesthetized with midazolam, fentanyl, nitrous oxide, and isoflurane; the trachea was intubated without paralysis. When anesthetic conditions and mechanical ventilation were stable, patients were randomly given 0.5 mg/kg atracurium or 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium over 5-10 s, and a blinded observer recorded cardiovascular, pulmonary, and cutaneous signs of adverse reactions for 6 min. RESULTS: Arterial pressures and heart rate decreased after atracurium, and systolic pressure and heart rate decreased with vecuronium; these changes were small in magnitude. Cardiovascular effects (decrease in blood pressure or change in heart rate) > 10% were common with both atracurium (60% of patients) and vecuronium (57%). Cardiovascular effects > 20% were more frequent with atracurium (37%) than with vecuronium (13%, P < 0.05). The incidence of noncardiovascular adverse events (increase in peak airway pressure > 5 cmH2O, tidal volume decrease > 10%, rashes, and wheezing) did not differ between atracurium (17%) and vecuronium (7%). The largest increase in peak airway pressure was 5.1 cmH2O in a patient whose tidal volume decreased 16% with vecuronium; in the remaining patients, tidal volume decreased < 10%. No patients experienced inspiratory wheezing, marked decreases in arterial oxygen saturation, or marked increases in end-tidal carbon dioxide tension. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that, in patients with asthma, adverse cardiovascular events are more common with atracurium than with vecuronium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldwell et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: