Key result
In bottlenose dolphins, inspiration causes an increase in instantaneous heart rate by 20.1%, while expiration results in a decrease by 33.5%.
Why the study?
Because total breath duration in dolphins is around 1 s, assessing the separate contributions of exhalation and inhalation to cardiac function changes during normal breathing was not possible.
Observational (n=3)
In bottlenose dolphins, inspiration increases instantaneous heart rate while expiration decreases it, demonstrating specific cardiorespiratory coupling mechanisms.
No immediate implications for human care; leaves open whether similar respiratory-heart rate coupling occurs in patients.
Introduction: The bottlenose dolphin ( Tursiops truncatus ) is an intermittent breather, where the breath begins with an exhalation followed by inhalation and an extended inter-breath interval ranging from 10 to 40 s. Breathing has been shown to alter both the instantaneous heart rate (i f H ) and stroke volume (iSV) in the bottlenose dolphin, with a transitory ventilatory tachycardia following the breath, and an exponential decrease to a stable i f H around 40 beats • min −1 during the inter-breath period. As the total breath duration in the dolphin is around 1 s, it is not possible to assess the contribution of exhalation and inhalation to these changes in cardiac function during normal breathing. Methods: In the current study, we evaluated the i f H response by separating expiration and inspiration of a breath, which allowed us to distinguish their respective contribution to the changes in i f H . We studied 3 individual male bottlenose dolphins trained to hold their breath between the different respiratory phases (expiration and inhalation). Results: Our data show that inspiration causes an increase in i f H , while expiration appears to result in a decrease in i f H . Discussion: These data provide improved understanding of the cardiorespiratory coupling in dolphins, and show how both exhalation and inhalation alters i f H .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fahlman et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiorespiratory coupling (n=3). Separation of expiration and inspiration vs. Normal breathing (full breath) was evaluated on Change in instantaneous heart rate (ifH). In bottlenose dolphins, inspiration causes an increase in instantaneous heart rate by 20.1%, while expiration results in a decrease by 33.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: