The equilibrium melting temperature,Tm,0, of poly(ferrocenyl dimethylsilane) (PFDMS) is re‐investigated using two PFDMS homopolymers and a PS‐b‐PFDMS copolymer (PS: polystyrene). The melting temperatures of samples crystallized at different crystallization temperatures,Tc, were found to depend in a nonlinear fashion onTc. Consequently, the Hoffmann–Weeks approach fails in determiningTm,0. The more reliable Gibbs–Thomson approach results in aTm,0 = (215 ± 11) °C for the PFDMS homopolymers, and aTm,0 = (179 ± 5) °C for the PFDMS microphases in the lamellar PS‐b‐PFDMS diblock copolymer. magnified image
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: