Findings are reported from a cohort of 1007 Scottish drug users entering treatment, including prison-based treatment, in 2001/2002. At follow-up, 33 months later, 14.4% of the sample had shared needles and/or syringes in the 3 months prior to interview; if the definition of equipment-sharing is extended to sharing filters, spoons or flush water, then 21.8% had shared in the same period. Logistic regression analyses were performed to establish the co-variables associated with equipment-sharing for those of the study population who were injectors at baseline and who had been interviewed at all four sweeps; separate additional analyses were performed for those receiving baseline treatment inside prison and for those receiving treatment outside prison. Variables occurring in the models independently associated with equipment-sharing included severity of drug dependence, poorer mental health and whether or not the interviewee's partner had a drug problem, with the last co-variable indicating the continuing importance of the social patterning of equipment sharing. Further, a very strong independent association was found between frequency of injecting and recent equipment-sharing: other things being equal, those injecting drugs most often are those who are most likely to share injecting equipment. This is not simply self-evidential; it also speaks to the importance of ‘accidental’ sharing. Theorising of this risk behaviour must not just emphasise the situated rationality of sharing, but must also embrace contingency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bloor et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: