Key result
Smartwatch-measured peak oxygen consumption correlated well with CPET-derived values (Pearson r=0.8627; 95% CI 0.8007-0.9064), though smartwatches measured higher by a mean of 3.15 mL/kg/min.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the correlation between exercise capacity assessed by peak oxygen consumption during a CPET and smartwatches reporting this parameter in adult congenital heart disease patients with complex lesions.
Does smartwatch-measured pVO2 correlate with CPET-measured pVO2 in patients with complex adult congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=48)
Does smartwatch-measured pVO2 correlate with CPET-measured pVO2 in patients with complex adult congenital heart disease?
Smartwatch-measured peak oxygen consumption correlates well with CPET-derived values in patients with complex adult congenital heart disease, although smartwatches tend to overestimate absolute values.
Smartwatch pVO2 correlates well with CPET in complex ACHD but overestimates values; leaves open utility for serial monitoring pending prospective validation.
Objective To evaluate for correlation between exercise capacity as assessed by peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) measurement during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and smartwatches reporting this parameter in patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) complex lesions. Methods A prospective study that included patients with ACHD either a Fontan circulation or a right ventricle supporting the systemic circulation who underwent two separate CPETs at least 1 year apart. Generalised estimating equations linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with correlation between smartwatch and CPET-derived pVO2. Results 48 patients (71% with a Fontan circulation, 42% females, mean age 33±9 years) underwent two CPETs between May 2018 and May 2022 with echocardiograms performed within 6 months of each CPET. Apple Watch was the predominant smartwatch used (79%). Smartwatch and CPET measured peak heart rate (Pearson correlation=0.932, 95% CI (0.899, 0.954)) and pVO2 (0.8627, 95% CI (0.8007, 0.9064) and 0.8634, 95% CI (0.7676, 0.9215) in the first and second CPET, respectively) correlated well, with smartwatch-measured pVO2 values measuring higher by a mean of 3.146 mL/kg/min (95% CI (2.559, 3.732)). Changes in pVO2 between the first and the second CPET also correlated well (Pearson correlation=0.9165, 95% CI (0.8549, 0.9525)), indicating that for every 1 mL/(min kg) change in CPET-measured pVO2, there was a corresponding 0.896 mL/(min kg) change in the smartwatch-measured pVO2. Conclusion Both absolute values and changes over time in pVO2 as measured by smartwatches and CPETs correlate well in patients with complex ACHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2023) conducted an observational in complex congenital heart disease (n=48). Smartwatch-measured peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was evaluated on Correlation between smartwatch and CPET-derived pVO2 (first CPET) (Pearson correlation 0.8627, 95% CI 0.8007-0.9064). Smartwatch-measured peak oxygen consumption correlated well with CPET-derived values (Pearson r=0.8627; 95% CI 0.8007-0.9064), though smartwatches measured higher by a mean of 3.15 mL/kg/min.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: