Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field heterogeneity in soil texture and site elevation (SE) may affect crop water and N use. A 2‐yr (1998–1999) study was conducted on the Texas High Plains to determine the interdependence between management (irrigation and N fertilization), soil heterogeneity (texture, soil water, and NO 3 ‐N) and topography, and their impact on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint yield and N uptake. Treatments were irrigation at 50 and 75% estimated cotton evapotranspiration (ET) and N rates at 0, 90, and 135 kg ha −1 Soil water content (SWC), lint yield, N uptake, and N fertilizer recovery, measured as a function of management and space, were higher on low positions. Mixed model analysis showed that irrigation was significant on SWC, lint yield, and N uptake ( P < 0.05) each year. The N treatment had no effect on lint yield or N uptake in 1998 because of high soil residual NO 3 ‐N, and the model residual was significant for all measured variables ( P < 0.0001). Sand, SWC, lint yield, and N uptake were negatively correlated with SE ( r ≥ −0.64). In 1998, lint yield, SWC, clay, sand, and SE were cross correlated within 60 to 80 m. Multivariate state‐space analysis showed that lint yield at position i was weighted on lint yield, SWC, clay, sand, and SE at previous position i − 1. It is concluded that 75% ET and N rate at 90 kg ha −1 would be the basis to consider variable water and N rates related to field conditions, and the state‐space model quantified spatial interdependence between irrigation, fertilization, and field heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: