Key result
Structured training on cardiotocograph interpretation led to a 65% improvement in technical aspects and interpretation skills among healthcare workers.
Why the study?
To evaluate the effect of structured training on cardiotocograph interpretation skills among healthcare workers involved in obstetric care in a resource-constrained setting.
Does structured training improve cardiotocograph interpretation skills among healthcare workers in a resource-constrained setting?
Observational (n=218)
Does structured training improve cardiotocograph interpretation skills among healthcare workers in a resource-constrained setting?
Structured training significantly improves cardiotocograph interpretation skills and technical knowledge among healthcare workers in resource-constrained obstetric settings.
May improve CTG skills among obstetric HCWs in low-resource settings; leaves open effects on perinatal outcomes and needs randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of structured training on the cardiotocograph (CTG) interpretation skills of healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in obstetric care in a recourse constrained setting. METHOD: In all, 218 HCWs completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. The intervention involved structured teaching on technical aspects of CTG monitoring, fetal physiology, and adaptation to stress, and a holistic approach to interpretation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics, frequencies, and percentages for categorical data. RESULTS: Only 26.2% of participants felt that their pre-graduate training was adequate; this was reflected by the poor baseline knowledge in CTG interpretation (56% misinterpreted) and lack of knowledge regarding technical aspects of CTG monitoring in 48.8% of participants. The training session led to a 65% improvement in technical aspects and interpretation. Those HCWs not receiving continuous training showed a more significant improvement (P < 0.001) and there was a 100% improvement in knowledge regarding the required documentation before commencing monitoring. Most (99.5%) HCWs acknowledged an improvement in knowledge, and 96.2% would participate in similar mandatory education sessions. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the fact that training in CTG monitoring is warranted and desired by HCWs. It also supports the implementation of structured CTG education in resource-constrained settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldman et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Cardiotocograph interpretation skills among healthcare workers (n=218). Structured training on cardiotocograph (CTG) interpretation vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Improvement in technical aspects and interpretation of CTG. Structured training on cardiotocograph interpretation led to a 65% improvement in technical aspects and interpretation skills among healthcare workers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: