Forty-five patients with cerebrovascular disease (single and multiple infarcts, intracerebral hemorrhages) were examined with X-ray CT, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET). In six patients with acute infarcts repeat measurements with all techniques were performed after 2 weeks. Magnetic resonance and PET were more sensitive in the detection of ischemic lesions than X-ray CT. With PET, functional disturbances could be demonstrated even in two cases where CT and MR were normal, while the latter techniques were superior in exactly localizing a lesion. Changes in lesion appearance with time were observed with all techniques, and the pathophysiologically important phenomena of hyperperfusion or hypermetabolism were documented in four infarcts with PET.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heiß et al. (1986) studied this question.