Missingness in explanatory variables requires a model for the covariates even if the interest lies only in a model for the outcomes given the covariates. An incorrect specification of the models for the covariates or for the missingness mechanism may lead to biased inferences for the parameters of interest. Previously published articles either use semi-/non-parametric flexible distributions for the covariates and identify the model via a missing at random assumption, or employ parametric distributions for the covariates and allow a more general non-random missingness mechanism. We consider the analysis of binary responses, combining a missing not at random mechanism with a non-parametric model based on a Dirichlet process mixture for the continuous covariates. We illustrate the proposal with simulations and the analysis of a dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poleto et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: