The traditional exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart is one of the most popular control charts used in practice today. The in-control robustness is the key to the proper design and implementation of any control chart, lack of which can render its out-of-control shift detection capability almost meaningless. To this end, Borror et al. [5 Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. 1999. Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality. J. Qual. Technol., 31(3): 309–316. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] studied the performance of the traditional EWMA chart for the mean for i.i.d. data. We use a more extensive simulation study to further investigate the in-control robustness (to non-normality) of the three different EWMA designs studied by Borror et al. [5 Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. 1999. Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality. J. Qual. Technol., 31(3): 309–316. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. Our study includes a much wider collection of non-normal distributions including light- and heavy-tailed and symmetric and asymmetric bi-modal as well as the contaminated normal, which is particularly useful to study the effects of outliers. Also, we consider two separate cases: (i) when the process mean and standard deviation are both known and (ii) when they are both unknown and estimated from an in-control Phase I sample. In addition, unlike in the study done by Borror et al. [5 Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. 1999. Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality. J. Qual. Technol., 31(3): 309–316. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]], the average run-length (ARL) is not used as the sole performance measure in our study, we consider the standard deviation of the run-length (SDRL), the median run-length (MDRL), and the first and the third quartiles as well as the first and the 99th percentiles of the in-control run-length distribution for a better overall assessment of the traditional EWMA chart's in-control performance. Our findings sound a cautionary note to the (over) use of the EWMA chart in practice, at least with some types of non-normal data. A summary and recommendations are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Human et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: