Key result
A comprehensive definition of MCI requiring >1 impaired score identified significantly smaller hippocampal volumes in aMCI compared to controls, whereas a typical single-score definition did not.
Why the study?
Does a comprehensive neuropsychological definition of MCI better differentiate hippocampal volumes and stroke risk compared to a typical definition in older adults?
Observational (n=65)
Does a comprehensive neuropsychological definition of MCI better differentiate hippocampal volumes and stroke risk compared to a typical definition in older adults?
A comprehensive neuropsychological definition of MCI requiring multiple impaired scores better correlates with hippocampal atrophy and stroke risk than a single-score definition.
Multi-score MCI criteria associate with hippocampal atrophy where single-score do not; hypothesis-generating for refined diagnostics pending prospective studies.
Wide-ranging conceptual and diagnostic approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have led to highly variable prevalence and progression rates. We sought to examine whether bilateral hippocampal volumes and cerebrovascular risk factors in individuals characterized by two different neuropsychological definitions of MCI subtypes would also differ. Participants were 65 nondemented, community-dwelling, older adults, ages 62-91 years, drawn from a larger group of individuals enrolled in a longitudinal study of normal aging. A comprehensive neuropsychological definition of MCI that required the presence of more than one impaired score in a cognitive domain resulted in expected anatomical results; hippocampal volumes were significantly smaller in the aMCI group as compared to cognitively normal or nonamnestic MCI participants. However, a typical definitional scheme for classifying MCI based only on the presence of one impaired score within a cognitive domain did not result in hippocampal differences between groups. Global stroke risk factors did not differ between the two definitional schemes, although the relationship between stroke risk variables and neuropsychological performance did vary by diagnostic approach. The comprehensive approach demonstrated associations between stroke risk and cognition, whereas the typical approach did not. Use of more sophisticated clinical decision-making and diagnostic approaches that incorporate comprehensive neuropsychological assessment techniques is supported by this convergence of neuropsychological, neuropathological, and stroke risk findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jak et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Mild cognitive impairment (n=65). Comprehensive neuropsychological definition of MCI vs. Typical definitional scheme of MCI was evaluated on Hippocampal volumes and stroke risk factors. A comprehensive definition of MCI requiring >1 impaired score identified significantly smaller hippocampal volumes in aMCI compared to controls, whereas a typical single-score definition did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: