Key result
Baseline Aβ positivity was associated with 0.87-mL/y faster whole-brain atrophy (95% CI 0.03-1.72), and each 10-mL additional WMHV was associated with 1.07-mL/y faster atrophy.
Why the study?
To quantify the independent and interactive associations of β-amyloid and white matter hyperintensity volume with rates of neurodegeneration, and examine the contributions of APOE ε4 and vascular risk across adulthood.
Do β-amyloid and white matter hyperintensity volume independently associate with rates of neurodegeneration in cognitively normal older adults?
Observational (n=346)
Do β-amyloid and white matter hyperintensity volume independently associate with rates of neurodegeneration in cognitively normal older adults?
Mean Difference: 0.87 (95% CI 0.03–1.72)
β-amyloid and presumed cerebrovascular disease have distinct and additive effects on rates of neurodegeneration in cognitively normal older adults.
Aβ and WMHV independently accelerate neurodegeneration in cognitively normal older adults; leaves open whether dual targeting alters clinical trajectories.
Background and Objectives The goals of this work were to quantify the independent and interactive associations of β-amyloid (Aβ) and white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV), a marker of presumed cerebrovascular disease (CVD), with rates of neurodegeneration and to examine the contributions of APOE ε4 and vascular risk measured at different stages of adulthood in cognitively normal members of the 1946 British Birth Cohort. Methods Participants underwent brain MRI and florbetapir-Aβ PET as part of Insight 46, an observational population-based study. Changes in whole-brain, ventricular, and hippocampal volume were directly measured from baseline and repeat volumetric T1 MRI with the boundary shift integral. Linear regression was used to test associations with baseline Aβ deposition, baseline WMHV, APOE ε4, and office-based Framingham Heart Study Cardiovascular Risk Score (FHS-CVS) and systolic blood pressure (BP) at ages 36, 53, and 69 years. Results Three hundred forty-six cognitively normal participants (mean [SD] age at baseline scan 70.5 [0.6] years; 48% female) had high-quality T1 MRI data from both time points (mean [SD] scan interval 2.4 [0.2] years). Being Aβ positive at baseline was associated with 0.87–mL/y faster whole-brain atrophy (95% CI 0.03, 1.72), 0.39–mL/y greater ventricular expansion (95% CI 0.16, 0.64), and 0.016–mL/y faster hippocampal atrophy (95% CI 0.004, 0.027), while each 10-mL additional WMHV at baseline was associated with 1.07–mL/y faster whole-brain atrophy (95% CI 0.47, 1.67), 0.31–mL/y greater ventricular expansion (95% CI 0.13, 0.60), and 0.014–mL/y faster hippocampal atrophy (95% CI 0.006, 0.022). These contributions were independent, and there was no evidence that Aβ and WMHV interacted in their effects. There were no independent associations of APOE ε4 with rates of neurodegeneration after adjustment for Aβ status and WMHV, no clear relationships between FHS-CVS or systolic BP and rates of neurodegeneration when assessed across the whole sample, and no evidence that FHS-CVS or systolic BP acted synergistically with Aβ. Discussion Aβ and presumed CVD have distinct and additive effects on rates of neurodegeneration in cognitively normal elderly. These findings have implications for the use of MRI measures as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and emphasize the importance of risk management and early intervention targeting both pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted an observational in Cognitively normal (n=346). β-amyloid (Aβ) positivity and white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV) vs. Aβ negativity and lower WMHV was evaluated on Changes in whole-brain, ventricular, and hippocampal volume (MD 0.87 mL/y faster whole-brain atrophy, 95% CI 0.03, 1.72). Baseline Aβ positivity was associated with 0.87-mL/y faster whole-brain atrophy (95% CI 0.03-1.72), and each 10-mL additional WMHV was associated with 1.07-mL/y faster atrophy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: