Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Core Ideas Study aimed to predict field N mineralization (N min ) from anaerobically incubated N (N an ). N an did not predict N min in areas with contrasting edaphic‐climatic properties. N min was predicted by a model including Nan, temperature and rainfall. The nitrogen (N) released after a 7‐d anaerobic incubation (N an ) is a good estimator of the size of the soil N mineralizable pool. However, there is a lack of information on how soil properties and climate affect the apparent field N mineralization (N min ) of this pool. The objective of our study was to develop and validate a simple model to estimate N min from N an in corn ( Zea mays L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) fields. To this end, we performed 100 field experiments where we measured N min , N an , rainfall, temperature (T C ), soil texture, pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and pre‐sowing mineral N concentration (N initial ). We performed a stepwise analysis to develop a model to predict N min using data from 70 sites, while the rest of the data was saved for model validation. The N an ranged from 16 to 94 mg kg –1 while N min ranged from 22 to 232 kg ha –1 . There was a strong association between N an and N min within regions with similar climate and edaphic properties. However, we could not fit a single significant model to estimate N min based solely on N an to be used in all regions. By considering other variables besides N an , we developed a model that allowed predicting N min independently from the site [N min = –252 + 12.3(T C ) + 1.37(N an ) + 0.27(rainfall)] ( R 2 = 0.89, model validation R 2 = 0.83). This model could be useful to adjust N fertilizer recommendations for corn and wheat, reducing the economic and environmental impact of fertilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvo et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: