Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To describe the post-transfusion survival of an entire, geographically defined population, we observed all residents of a US county who underwent perioperative transfusion before and after the introduction of a large autologous transfusion programme. We enrolled 444 and 1540 county residents, transfused in 1981 and in 1986-88, respectively. Complete follow-up (until death or for 5 years) was available on 1960 patients (98.8%). Of patients transfused in 1986-88, 67.6% were alive at 5 years, having survived for a mean (+/- SE) period of 46.15 (+/- 0.575) months. The survival statistics were 66.2% and 46.09 (+/- 1.047) months, respectively, for patients transfused in 1981 (P = 0.8424). Transfusion in 1986-88 vs. 1981 (with 615 [40%] vs. six [1.3%] patients receiving some autologous blood) did not have an effect on survival (P = 0.3892), following adjustment for age, gender, transfusion dose, receipt of a single-unit transfusion and transfusing surgical service. We conclude that the survival of an entire, geographically defined transfused population is substantially longer than that reported previously for patients referred to tertiary-care medical centres. The aggregate 5-year survival of patients transfused in 1981 and in 1986-88 does not differ, despite differences in patient case-mix and in perioperative transfusion practice, particularly as it relates to autologous blood usage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vamvakas et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: