Randomized trial reveals that inclusive classroom environments improve grades for marginalized STEM students, indicating that environmental interventions outperform individual-focused resilience...
Students from marginalized groups tend to achieve lower grades in STEM college courses than their non-marginalized peers. We tested the effectiveness of two interventions, one aimed at changing the environment and the other aimed at changing the students. The “Inclusion intervention” helped instructors create a cooperative classroom environment where students felt interconnected and pro-inclusion social expectations were made explicit. The “Resilience intervention” consisted of well-established strategies that focus on changing the cognitions and attributions of students from marginalized groups. We compared the two interventions against a no-exposure control group in a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 60 STEM courses ( N Students = 2,116). Results show that in courses assigned to the Inclusion intervention, students from marginalized racial/ethnic groups obtained better grades – more than half a letter grade – than those in the control condition, whereas the Resilience intervention had little beneficial effect. Our research demonstrates the importance of making the classroom environment more inclusive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennedy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: