Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) are essential nutrients for optimum plant growth. A commercial‐grade biosolid‐enriched ammonium sulfate (Bio/AMS) was evaluated and compared with a conventional, commercial‐grade ammonium sulfate (AMS) to investigate the release patterns of N and S in soils. The laboratory‐based studies included (a) characterization of fertilizer sources, (b) soil leaching columns with 0.01% citric acid in an acid soil, (c) soil incubation followed by 1 M KCl extraction in a neutral soil, and (d) NH3 volatilization measurements in an alkaline soil. With one exception, the results showed no significant difference in the amount or the rate of N or S released from each between the two products in all the studies. In that one exception, the Bio/AMS leached significantly less N after 56 d, but not before 14 d, than the conventional AMS application. In greenhouse‐based evaluations, the Bio/AMS and AMS performed comparably at providing S nutrient to the biomass yield and S uptake by canola (Brassica napus L.) at maturity in neutral and alkaline soils. The studies also showed no significant N uptake differences between Bio/AMS and AMS by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) biomass at maturity in acid and neutral soils. The results from these laboratory and greenhouse studies demonstrated that the Bio/AMS product is a simple physical mixture of biosolids with AMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chien et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: