Retrospective study demonstrates high accuracy of a machine learning model for grading ulcerative colitis severity, suggesting a viable digital pathology tool for clinical assessment.
The STRIDE II consensus recognizes histopathological healing in ulcerative colitis as a key therapeutic target. This study aimed to develop and internally evaluate a quantitative image-based model for the binary classification of mild versus moderate-to-severe UC based on histopathological features. Pathological slides from 167 ulcerative colitis patients (58 mild, 109 moderate-to-severe) were retrospectively collected from two medical centers. A U-Net model quantified glandular structures (number, area ratio), Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix analyzed texture features, and a five-interval grayscale histogram was modeled. Features selection was performed using LASSO regression. Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Machine learning models were constructed and their performance was evaluated. In the five-fold cross-validation analysis within the training set, SVM achieved the highest mean ROC-AUC and was selected as the final model. After refitting on the full training set, the final SVM model achieved an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.742–0.958), a sensitivity of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.691–0.933), a specificity of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.608–0.942), and an F1-score of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.774–0.952) on the independent test set. SHAP analysis identified gland area ratio, fibrosis, and GrayHist_100_149, defined as the proportion of mucosal pixels with intermediate grayscale intensity ranging from 100 to 149 in grayscale-converted H&E images, as the most important predictors. This study integrated glandular geometry, texture features, and grayscale analysis using machine learning to develop a quantitative auxiliary tool for the binary stratification of mild versus moderate-to-severe UC. These findings suggest that this approach may serve as a complementary approach for histological assessment in ulcerative colitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: