Theoretical analysis demonstrates stable finite gluing of Anderson Green functions across clean and disordered regimes, indicating a robust framework for tight-binding models.
We present a finite-gluing framework for Anderson Green functions that retains the clean-crystal and strong-disorder limits as distinct analytic anchors. The weak anchor is a resolvent expansion about a freely chosen clean reference Hamiltonian. The strong anchor is a random atomic/corridor resolvent that exactly resums walks internal to a finite endpoint-conditioned corridor. These two anchors define the minimal construction; no middle sector is required. As an optional refinement, we construct an intermediate target one level earlier in step space. For fixed endpoints $x,y$, short reference walks are kept exactly through Nₜˡᵒᶜ(x,y)=(Aᵗ)xy, while the long-step continuation on the cubic reference graph is modeled by Nₜᵃˢʸ(x,y)=χxy(t)Cxy6ᵗ t-dₛ/2 exp\![-aₛT(x,y)/t], T(x,y)=max_T∈ IₚᵣₑPT(x,y). The two descriptions are glued over a finite step window, so $t=0$, minimum-step constraints, and parity remain in the exact sector, whereas the long-walk tail is compressed into dₛ, $T(x,y)$, and one matching amplitude. In a fourteen-displacement clean-reference pilot, the median absolute relative error of the truncated normalized generating factor at η=0.05 is 3.17×10⁻⁴. The principal Anderson result is stability, not a precision transition estimate. In the fixed-center $L=7,9$ pilot, the ratio of middle-refined to two-anchor global endpoint-block error lies in $0.9909$--$1.0016$ with median $0.99998$, while the mean absolute change in the size-normalized decay diagnostic is $0.0084$. Thus the path-count refinement can be inserted without destabilizing the recorded endpoint gluing. Self-consistent recentering is retained only as a stress test because it may converge when the finite-size crossing is itself unreliable. No critical exponent is estimated from the present small, low-statistics data. The architecture is intended to support future calculations that start from material- or symmetry-specific clean tight-binding models, retain a strong-disorder description in the same representation, and optionally use independently established universal critical data as gluing constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshiki Ueoka (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: