Conceptual hazard analysis reveals unique legal, regulatory, and public safety risks from AI clinical decision support in occupational medicine, highlighting the need for domain-specific safety...
Occupational and environmental medicine (OEM) clinicians operate at the intersection of clinical medicine and the legal system. The impact of the clinical decisions and determinations made by OEM clinicians extends far beyond clinical outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) for OEM-specific clinician tasks requires careful consideration of the domain-specific potential harms that may arise from clinician use of this technology in OEM, as such hazards may not be readily apparent using conventional AI safety and risk assessment frameworks for the general healthcare domain. This conceptual systems-based hazard analysis applies the System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) framework to the use of AI-CDSS in clinical OEM, focusing on domain-specific hazards. This analysis identified legal, regulatory, economic, and public safety hazards that should be addressed to ensure responsible and ethical integration of AI-CDSS in clinical OEM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: