Cross-sectional study finds artificial intelligence attitudes correlate with e-healthy diet literacy in adults, suggesting digital perceptions influence online nutrition literacy.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between e-healthy diet literacy (e-HDL) and general attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) among adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 610 adults aged 19–64 years. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire consisting of five sections, including sociodemographic characteristics, digital nutrition information practices, AI use in nutrition and dietetics, the e-Healthy Diet Literacy Questionnaire (e-HDLQ), and the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS). Descriptive statistics, validity and reliability analyses, correlation analyses, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were performed. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of the participants was 33.07 ± 11.36 years, and 50.8% were female. The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and convergent validity. Structural model analysis showed that positive attitudes toward AI were positively associated with e-HDL (β = 0.243, p < 0.001), whereas negative attitudes toward AI were negatively associated with e-HDL (β = −0.232, p < 0.001). Among the e-HDLQ dimensions, the strongest loading was observed for finding e-healthy diet information (β = 0.844), followed by applying e-healthy diet information (β = 0.641), digital healthy eating literacy (β = 0.636), judging e-healthy diet information (β = 0.308), and understanding e-healthy diet information (β = 0.277). Together, positive and negative attitudes toward AI explained 12.2% of the variance in e-HDL (R2 = 0.122), indicating a modest explanatory contribution. Conclusions: Positive and negative attitudes toward AI were independently associated with e-HDL among adults. Although the explained variance was modest, AI attitudes may represent one of several factors associated with digital nutrition literacy, warranting further investigation in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özenir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: