Key result
Higher HbA1c/HDL-C ratio is linked to ~77% higher odds of composite CVD.
Why the study?
Does a higher HbA1c/HDL-C ratio associate with increased risk of composite cardiovascular disease in population-based cohorts?
Observational
Yes
Does a higher HbA1c/HDL-C ratio associate with increased risk of composite cardiovascular disease in population-based cohorts?
Odds Ratio: 1.77 (95% CI 1.4–2.22)
The HbA1c/HDL-C ratio is a potential complementary metabolic marker associated with cardiovascular disease risk, particularly stroke, though its magnitude and pattern vary across populations.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with glucose and lipid metabolic disturbances closely involved. We therefore assessed how the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (HHC) relates to composite CVD and individual subtypes across two population-based cohorts, while also testing whether the associations varied by population and cardiovascular outcome. Two nationally representative data sources were analyzed: the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2001–2018) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011–2020). Within NHANES, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared how well HHC, HbA1c, and HDL-C discriminated prevalent composite CVD. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used for the cross-sectional NHANES analysis, whereas Cox proportional hazards regression was used for the longitudinal CHARLS analysis. We further assessed how HHC relates to CVD and its subtypes through restricted cubic splines (RCS), separate subgroup analyses, and an exploratory mediation analysis. In NHANES, higher HHC was associated with prevalent composite CVD and several cardiovascular subtypes after multivariable adjustment. After full adjustment, the odds of composite CVD were greater in the highest than in the lowest HHC quartile (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.40–2.22). In the ROC analysis, HHC showed an AUC of 0.680, compared with 0.620 for HbA1c and 0.564 for HDL-C. Within CHARLS, higher HHC predicted incident composite CVD (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04–1.45) and stroke (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.29–2.24), whereas heart disease was not associated (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70–1.05). The NHANES restricted cubic spline models indicated nonlinear patterns across several examined cardiovascular outcomes; CHARLS showed no statistically significant evidence of nonlinearity. In the exploratory mediation model, serum albumin explained 3.79% of what was observed as the HHC-CVD association. Higher HHC was associated with cardiovascular outcomes, although the magnitude and pattern of the associations differed across populations and CVD subtypes. HHC showed potential as a complementary metabolic marker, particularly for stroke risk assessment in CHARLS; however, its incremental predictive value requires further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease. HbA1c/HDL-C ratio (HHC) vs. Lowest HHC quartile was evaluated on Composite CVD (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.40-2.22). A higher HbA1c/HDL-C ratio was associated with increased odds of prevalent composite CVD in NHANES (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.40-2.22) and incident composite CVD in CHARLS (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.04-1.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: