Computational study demonstrates improved generalized category discovery in remote sensing images via dual resource allocation, highlighting cost-effective cross-modal semantic guidance.
Generalized category discovery (GCD) aims to classify known categories while discovering novel ones in unlabeled data, yet existing methods lack mechanisms to correct boundary-ambiguous samples that receive noisy pseudo-labels, as they primarily rely on visual feature learning without external semantic guidance. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer a natural source of cross-modal semantic correction. However, applying VLM-guided contrastive signals directly within the GCD training loop proves counterproductive because the locally-oriented InfoNCE loss conflicts geometrically with the globally oriented K-means objective in the shared backbone space. We identify the root cause as a dual resource allocation problem: the VLM-derived signal must be allocated to the correct feature subspace to avoid geometric conflict with K-means clustering (space allocation), and the limited VLM inference budget must be allocated to the correct samples to maximize discriminative return (budget allocation). These two decisions are coupled; failure on either renders the other ineffective. To resolve this, we propose DualGLEAN, a framework that addresses the dual allocation challenge through two coupled mechanisms: decoupled contrastive alignment (DCA), which routes the VLM-guided neighbor contrastive loss to a dedicated projector space while preserving the backbone space for global clustering, and compound uncertainty querying (CUQ), a three-stage filtering metric that jointly evaluates predictive entropy, boundary proximity, and local label inconsistency to direct VLM queries exclusively to truly boundary-critical samples. Extensive experiments on the AID and RSSDIVCS datasets demonstrate that DualGLEAN achieves strong performance, improves four diverse GCD baselines as a plug-in module, generalizes across seven VLM backbones, introduces zero additional trainable parameters to the base GCD network, and incurs a total VLM API cost of only CNY 2.45 per full training run on the AID dataset under the default search-scope configuration, with the cost scaling linearly with the query budget.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: