Archival cross-match study reveals 204 hidden sub-arcsecond stellar companions among 5,966 TESS exoplanet host candidates, indicating potential systematic overestimation of planetary radii.
We present a high-efficiency astrometric and photometric vetting pipeline to isolateunresolved sub-arcsecond stellar companions contaminating the TESS Objects of Interest(TOI) catalog. Instead of utilizing arbitrary sample thresholds or local processing constraints,we cross-matched the entire active population of the NASA Exoplanet Archive (5966 activecandidates) against the Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) database. By targeting systems withsignificant Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE > 1.4) and a high Image ParameterDetermination multi-peak fraction (IPDfmp > 5%), followed by an additional astrometricquality-control stage (Section 2.4), we identified a vetted population of 204 sub-arcsecondbinary-star candidates that lack prior duplicity classifications in the literature. We furthercross-matched this catalog against the bulk ExoFOP-TESS imaging-observations log (Section2.5) and find that 78 of the 204 candidates have no high-resolution imaging observationcurrently on record, making them efficient targets for new follow-up. These undetectedcompanions likely induce systematic photometric dilution, leading to underestimated transitdepths and overestimated planetary radii. Confirmation of physical duplicity for any individualsystem requires dedicated high-contrast imaging or speckle interferometry and is notestablished by astrometric indicators or the absence of an ExoFOP record alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alejandro Heredia Teva (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: