Experimental evaluation demonstrates secure lossless encryption in retinal fundus images, highlighting efficient selective protection for teleophthalmology networks.
Retinal fundus images transmitted through teleophthalmology networks carry protected health information subject to HIPAA and equivalent regulations, yet existing chaos-based encryption schemes apply uniform computational effort regardless of the clinical significance of image regions. This paper presents ROI-Aware 4D Chaos-Based Encryption (ROHE-4D), a privacy-preserving framework that allocates computationally stronger encryption operations to a selected anatomical ROI. A lightweight deterministic morphological segmentation procedure identifies the selected anatomical ROI, comprising the optic disc and macular region, without covering approximately 16.6% of image area on average, without model training. ROI pixels undergo key-dependent affine byte substitution with XOR diffusion with cipher feedback, whereas background pixels receive single-pass XOR diffusion, an architectural design choice. For each image, the keystream seed is derived from a 256-bit secret key, the SHA-256 image fingerprint, and a unique 128-bit nonce using a two-stage SHA-256 key-derivation construction. The uniformly generated secret key provides a 256-bit key space. The 4D system has one positive Lyapunov exponent (λ 1 ≈ 0.69) and the system is classified as chaotic. Morphological ROI segmentation achieves optic disc IoU of 0.752 ± 0.157 on synthetic images with circular ground-truth masks. Experiments on APTOS 2019 (3662 images, 512 × 512) and IDRiD (516 images, 1024 × 1024) demonstrate the following results: ciphertext entropy 7.9970 and 7.9989 bits/byte respectively. NPCR 99.62% and 99.61%, UACI 33.48% and 33.47%, adjacent-pixel ciphertext horizontal correlation 0.0186 (APTOS) and 0.0113 (IDRiD), key sensitivity ≈ 99.59% per 1-bit key perturbation, encryption latency 9.8 ms on CPU and 47.1 ms on Jetson AGX Orin. An analytical peak-memory estimate of approximately 2.5 MB based on principal array allocations at 512 × 512 and bit-exact lossless recovery across all 4178 test images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirubakaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: