Observational analysis reveals interval-dependent kinematic anisotropy in 20 Galactic globular clusters, indicating negative velocity gradients do not uniquely confirm intermediate-mass black holes.
We present an interval-defined framework for summarising projected internal kinematics in globular clusters (GCs) using the Global Kinematic Anisotropy Parameter (KAP), the Global Kinematic Index (GKI), and the raw and noise-aware profile-scatter diagnostics Ds and Ds, corr. KAP is a variance-weighted ratio of projected radial–tangential squared-dispersion contrasts, whereas GKI is the empirical outward logarithmic slope of the combined velocity-dispersion profile over a specified radial interval. We apply the framework to homogeneous HST/HACKS proper-motion profiles for 20 Galactic GCs. Within the primary normalized interval R ≤ Rh, l, five clusters satisfy the radial-KAP criterion, fifteen are consistent with zero net projected KAP contrast, and none satisfies the tangential criterion. Over the full available HST range, seven clusters satisfy the radial-KAP criterion and thirteen are consistent with zero net projected KAP contrast; NGC 6388 and NGC 6441 account for the two interval-dependent class changes. Eighteen clusters have significantly negative GKI within R ≤ Rh, l, while NGC 5927 and NGC 6441 are consistent with flat empirical profiles. Eleven clusters have Ds, corr=0, and nine retain non-zero corrected scatter. KAP and GKI are radial-interval-dependent observational summaries, while Ds and Ds, corr only identify profiles requiring bin-level inspection. A negative GKI over the broader HST interval is not specific to an intermediate-mass black hole, and unresolved spheres of influence cannot be excluded by these binned profiles. Analytic uncertainty propagation, parametric resampling, leave-one-bin-out tests, and controlled synthetic experiments support the internal consistency of the framework under the conditions examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turaev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: