Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Factorial experiment demonstrates advertising credibility mediates endorser and message effects in active golfers, indicating matching experts with rational claims optimizes persuasion.
Purpose Drawing on source credibility theory, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), match-up theory, and the meaning transfer model, this study examines how endorser type (celebrity vs. expert) and message appeal (humorous vs. rational) jointly shape advertising credibility and a set of consumer responses, namely brand recall, brand attitude, and purchase intention, in golf equipment advertising, a high-involvement and performance-driven context. Design/methodology/approach Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects experimental design with 177 active golfers, the study tests the direct, mediating, and interactive effects of endorsement cues on cognitive (brand recall), affective (brand attitude), and behavioral (purchase intention) outcomes. Findings The results indicate that endorser type and message appeal do not exert significant direct effects on these consumer responses. Instead, advertising credibility emerges as the central mediating mechanism explaining consumer responses. Interaction analyses show that credibility and persuasive effectiveness are maximized under conditions of endorser–appeal congruence, with expert–rational pairings outperforming all other combinations. Mediation and moderated mediation tests further demonstrate that credibility explains the indirect effects of endorser type on all outcomes, particularly when informational congruence is high. Practical implications From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest that in performance-oriented markets, expertise and rational messaging are more effective than fame and humor in generating credible and persuasive brand communication. Originality/value The study advances endorsement theory by conceptualizing advertising credibility as a process variable that links message cues to cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses. It further integrates match-up theory and the ELM within a high-involvement, technical consumption context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budrikis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: