Greenhouse experiment reveals homogeneous high-phosphorus fertilization maximizes growth and nutrient uptake in maize, indicating limited utility of localized application or bacterial inoculation.
Background and aims Low phosphorus (P) availability limits sustainable crop production on the Loess Plateau. Heterogeneous nutrient supply and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria have been proposed to improve P availability, yet their combined effects remain unclear. Methods A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted with maize in the loess soil under two application methods (homogeneous vs heterogeneous), two P supply levels (50 and 200 mg P kg−1), and with live or inactivated Bacillus subtilis to assess plant growth, P uptake and bacterial community responses. Key results After 47 days, heterogeneous P supply induced P enrichment in patch soil and increased the P activation coefficient by 216%, but reduced shoot biomass by 23%, as well as shoot and root P content by 42% and 35% respectively. Bacillus subtilis inoculation promoted dry mass by only 36% under homogeneous supply and 33% under heterogeneous supply, with diminished effects under high P. Heterogeneous P supply significantly altered the bacterial community structure, and reduced the Shannon’s diversity index, with the diversity being negatively correlated with soil available P concentration. Conclusion Even though heterogeneous supply can drive spatial redistribution of soil P and reshape microbial community, it failed to significantly improve plant P acquisition. Inoculation with Bacillus subtilis slightly enhanced root growth, but its benefit weakened under high P. Co-application of B. subtilis with P-fertilizer provided no additional benefit over P application alone. Therefore, homogeneous high-P supply remains the most effective approach for enhancing P uptake and promoting maize growth in loess soil in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: