The European Union and United Kingdom (EU+) remain heavily dependent on imported high-protein feed, primarily soybeans, raising concerns about supply resilience and environmental impacts. We assess three legume-based pathways—trade, policy support, and dietary shift—against a 2030 projection horizon, using integrated regional agro-economic, farm-level, and life cycle assessment models. The trade pathway, simulating a complete interruption of protein imports, provides an analytical upper bound for domestic EU+ legume production. It drives substantial land reallocation (+1.5 million ha legume area) but fails to fully replace imports, resulting in higher prices (+150% for soybeans) and reduced livestock output (-3%), exposing systemic vulnerabilities. Farm-level results underscore economic incentives over agroecological potential. Policy support moderately increases legume cultivation with limited market impacts but improves farm-level viability where conditions are favourable. Dietary shifts increase pulse imports (+100%) but reduce global GHG emissions more effectively than supply-side measures. Overall, the results highlight legumes’ potential, limits of self-sufficiency, and the complementary roles of economic incentives and demand-side measures for sustainable and resilient EU+ food systems. Assessing trade disruption, policy support, and dietary shifts shows that expanding legume production in the EU and UK improves resilience but cannot replace protein imports, while demand-side changes deliver greater climate benefits, based on integrated agro‑economic and life cycle modelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: