Observational analysis reveals no robust bimodality in physical parameters across kick velocity modes in radio pulsars, suggesting natal kick bimodality reflects observational selection effects.
According to several studies, analysis of observational data and theoretical modeling favor a bimodal distribution of the natal velocity kick of neutron stars. We analyze this proposal by using available data on radio pulsars. For ∼ 200 normal isolated radio pulsars with well-measured spin and kinematic parameters, we determine if they belong to the low- or high-velocity mode of such a distribution by applying the parametrization proposed by Igoshev (2020). Our results demonstrate that about 23 % belong to the low-velocity mode. We then analyze the differences in the properties of the two sets of pulsars belonging to the two modes. For some parameters (characteristic ages and distances), we see a clear difference between the two modes. However, for these quantities, it can be easily attributed to selection bias. For those parameters that are not a subject of strong selection, such as pulse width, we do not observe any difference. Interestingly, we detect a notable difference in the magnetic field distribution between the two modes. Lower field pulsars ( B ≲ 10 12 ~G) are overabundant among objects from the low-velocity mode in comparison to the high-velocity one. In particular, among pulsars with low fields ( ≲ 10 11 ~G), we do not identify any objects from the high-velocity mode of the kick distribution. The origin of this discrepancy is not clear, and we discuss several possibilities. Our analysis demonstrates that most probably, this feature can be explained by selection effects. In particular, the difference in the magnetic field distribution for low- and high-velocity pulsars demonstrates complicated behavior when an upper limit on the characteristic age of pulsars is introduced. Thus, we conclude that there is no robust bimodality in physical parameters of radio pulsars that can be related to the proposed bimodality of the kick velocity. This can be considered as an indirect argument against the hypothetical bimodality in the NS kick distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazarev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: