Qualitative study reveals how conflicting internal language preferences disrupt revitalization in the Kalanga speech community, highlighting the need to resolve intra-group divisions.
This article analyses the influence of an endangered language’s speech community’s internal challenges with the language revitalisation initiative. Deploying theories on the controversial relationship between language and identity, the article examines how diverse language preferences for the speech community’s individual members influence their participation in and support of the language revitalisation initiative/programme. Using a qualitative research methodology that involved key informant interviews and focus group discussions, we found that the different groups from the Kalanga speech community expressed their views and fears on how language choices and preferences negatively influence language revitalisation initiatives. The article concludes that before considering the external challenges and enemies, the speech community must critically examine and address its internal challenges. While external challenges affect progress, the internal challenges make the language speakers their own enemies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mumpande et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: