Observational analysis reveals negative relative flow differentials following direct access amendments, indicating that easing foreign investment channels does not immediately spur targeted inflows.
This study investigates whether two amendments to Saudi Arabia’s Qualified Foreign Investor (QFI) framework increased QFI net flows relative to swap-holder flows. Drawing on 140 weekly observations from December 2015 to August 2018, the analysis estimates controlled QFI-minus-swap flow differentials in event windows surrounding the 2016 and 2018 regulatory amendments. The estimated differentials are negative and statistically significant, at approximately −0.063 and −0.032 percentage points of free-float market capitalization per week, respectively. These results are robust across the main short-run empirical specifications and a range of robustness checks. The evidence indicates that easing the direct-access framework did not produce an immediate strengthening of QFI flows relative to swap-holder flows. More broadly, the findings underscore the importance of assessing capital-market liberalization not only through changes in aggregate foreign participation but also through the relative flow performance of the access channel targeted by reform. This perspective provides a more nuanced basis for assessing the effectiveness of financial-market reforms in supporting market development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aljarboa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: