Commentary reveals eco-affective health as a vital driver of institutional endurance in planetary health leadership, highlighting the systemic value of emotional responses.
Planetary health leadership increasingly depends on the capacity to sustain engagement, legitimacy and long-term action under accelerating environmental change. While leadership frameworks in planetary health have advanced in addressing governance, systems transformation and sustainability practices, they have largely overlooked a foundational dimension through which environmental change is experienced and acted on: affect. This commentary introduces an eco-affective health-informed leadership perspective, arguing that emotional responses to environmental change, such as distress, fatigue, loss and hope, are not peripheral or individual-level phenomena but system-level signals that shape policy acceptance, institutional endurance and behavioural persistence within health systems. Drawing on evidence from sustainability science, public health and affective research, the paper reframes eco-affective dynamics as sources of strategic insight rather than obstacles to be managed or medicalised. A concise leadership-oriented framework is presented to support planetary health leaders in recognising, interpreting and responding to eco-affective signals across institutions, communities and policy environments, with practical implications for governance, decision-making and health system resilience. By integrating eco-affective health into planetary health leadership, this commentary advances a human-centred approach to leading through environmental disruption, positioning lived experience as central to the durability, legitimacy and effectiveness of planetary health action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucas Murrins Marques (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: