Analytical study reveals a platform-independent mass spectrometry workflow for detecting pesticides in honey bees, highlighting improved cross-laboratory incident screening.
When investigating honey bee suspected poisoning events, traditional targeted methods may overlook relevant compounds. Thus, a suspect screening workflow combining two complementary and platform-independent strategies in parallel, an exact mass screening tool and a combinatorial analysis of tandem mass (MS2) spectra, was developed to enhance exposure coverage. Its performance was assessed across three distinct high-resolution mass spectrometers (HRMS), using well-defined quality assurance and quality control metrics to ensure transparent and reproducible reporting of nontargeted analyses. True positive rates exceeded 80% across instruments during exact mass feature detection. Incorporating MS2-based annotation further improved identification confidence, with few false positives (≤9). Applied to incurred bee samples, the workflow identified atrazine and two transformation products, deethylatrazine and deisopropylatrazine. Overall, this workflow provides a comprehensive framework for investigating bee poisoning incidents and represents an important step toward improving the transfer of suspect screening workflows and the comparability of HRMS data across laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: