Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates over 93% accuracy for two-stage machine learning in well-log stratigraphic identification, highlighting its potential for petroleum reservoir characterization.
Accurate stratigraphic identification is essential for petroleum-development planning, but class imbalance and similar well-log responses between adjacent strata remain major challenges. This study uses well-log data from nine anonymized wells in the Ordos Basin, covering approximately 1,200–2,400 m and nine stratigraphic units from Yan 9 to Chang 10_1. Seven wells were used for training and hyperparameter optimization, while Wells H and I were reserved for blind evaluation. A two-stage framework was developed by decomposing the nine-class task into three-class and seven-class subtasks using an operational depth constraint within Yan 10_2. Savitzky–Golay filtering was applied, and XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, Stacking, and Att-BiLSTM were evaluated. Three composite features were constructed before SHAP analysis based on petrophysical relationships and exploratory analysis of the training wells. SHAP was used for post-hoc interpretation rather than feature construction or selection. CatBoost achieved the strongest overall performance among the evaluated models, although no single model performed best for every stratum. With an adjacent-stratum boundary tolerance of approximately ±1 m, the framework achieved accuracies of 93.4% and 95.1% for Wells H and I, respectively, with macro-F1 scores of 0.867 and 0.835. These results demonstrate its potential for stratigraphic identification within the study area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: