Experimental study demonstrates efficient cross-domain black-box adversarial attacks on deep neural networks, highlighting widespread vulnerabilities in deployed machine learning APIs.
Evaluating the adversarial robustness of deployed deep neural networks is critical for trustworthy AI, yet existing black-box assessment tools assume homogeneous input domains shared between surrogates and targets, an assumption rarely met in practice. Cross-domain transfer attacks are inherently ill-posed due to profound structural and semantic discrepancies between surrogate and target models. Conventional methods often fail due to gradient stagnation and label misalignment. We propose Cross-Domain Adversarial Optimization (CDAO), a training-free paradigm establishing high-fidelity adversarial guidance across heterogeneous domains without task-specific retraining. Differentiable Spatial-Channel Mapping (DSCM) reconciles physical dimension mismatches, preserving analytical differentiability across mismatched input dimensions. To resolve semantic disjointness, Target Proxy Distillation (TPD) casts proxy target selection as a multi-fidelity candidate-selection problem analogous to Best Arm Identification. Using multi-fidelity Successive Halving, TPD adaptively distills informative proxy classes with minimal query overhead, eliminating shared label assumptions. By unifying structural and semantic alignment into a plug-and-play pipeline, CDAO enables effective cross-domain guidance at inference time. Extensive evaluations across cross-dataset image-classification settings that differ in architecture, resolution, channel format, and label space demonstrate that CDAO achieves the best transferability and favorable query efficiency among the evaluated inference-time black-box baselines for cross-dataset image classification, reducing the end-to-end query budget to Q ∼ 103 (an order of magnitude below the Q ∼ 104 regime of pure query-driven attacks). Concretely, the end-to-end budget is only 1000 and 3000 queries for small- and large-scale datasets, respectively, yielding targeted ASR gains of 38.5% on CIFAR-10 and 43.7% on ImageNet-1K over the strongest baseline. These results highlight that even models deployed behind black-box APIs remain vulnerable to structured cross-domain probes, and that robustness evaluation tools must account for heterogeneous threat surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: