Objective Our prime objective was to study the production of big endothelin-1 (Big ET-1) and its conversion to ET-1 in the lungs of newborn rabbits exposed to meconium. Our second objective was to study the effect of captopril on endothelin expression. Design Prospective, comparative study. Setting Research laboratory of the Michael Reese Hospital and the University of Illinois, Chicago. Subjects Two-wk-old rabbit pups. Interventions Rabbit pups were instilled with meconium or saline into the lungs. Another group, pretreated with captopril, was also instilled with either meconium or saline. Measurements and Main Results After meconium or saline instillation, lung lavage was performed. Big ET-1 and ET-1 were measured in lung lavage fluid by using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in all groups. Also, lungs were studied by histochemistry analysis for a morphologic evaluation of meconium-induced damage. In the lavage fluid of saline-instilled pups, ET-1 remained low and no increase in Big ET-1 levels was observed. In meconium-instilled animals, bioactive ET-1 levels were significantly higher, with a peak at 8 hrs after instillation. The conversion ratio of Big ET-1 to ET-1 in the meconium group increased from 2.19 at the initial period to 7.19 at 8 hrs after meconium instillation. Conclusions Our conclusion is that aspiration of meconium causes lung injury in the newborn and that this injury is associated with a significant increase in ET peptide production in the lungs. We also showed that ET production is inhibited by pretreatment of rabbits with captopril before meconium-induced injury. ET-1 and its conversion from ET-1 in response to meconium may play important roles in increasing pulmonary vascular resistance and lung cell death, even in the absence of hypoxia. In general, we conclude, that ET-1 levels are significantly elevated in meconium-instilled rabbits compared with saline-instilled ones, and both can be significantly inhibited by pretreatment with captopril. Whether ET-1 contributes directly to the pathophysiology of or is simply a marker of meconium aspiration syndrome remains speculative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zagariya et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: