PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of phacoemulsification combined with intravitreal (i.v.t.) bevacizumab injection in diabetics with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and cataract. METHODS: This retrospective study included diabetic patients with cataract and CSME who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with a 2.5-mg bevacizumab i.v.t injection (ivBe) (15 eyes) or without ivBe (controls, 14 eyes). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optic coherence tomography (OCT), and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: In the ivBe group, the OCT images demonstrated that CMT (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) decreased significantly from 466 +/- 105 at baseline to 333 +/- 107, 313 +/- 138 and 333 +/- 111 microm at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, after treatment (P < 0.05). The visual acuity in logMAR (mean +/- SD) improved significantly from 1.66 +/- 0.39 at baseline to 1.30 +/- 0.50, 1.15 +/- 0.42, 0.99 +/- 0.48, and 1.03+/- 0.44 at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, after treatment (P < 0.05). However, in the control group, the CMT changed insignificantly from 443 +/- 109 at baseline to 463 +/- 106, 425 +/- 128, and 421 +/- 119 microm at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, respectively after treatment (P > 0.05). The visual acuity in logMAR improved insignificantly from 1.63 +/- 0.42 at baseline to 1.43 +/- 0.53, and 1.39 +/- 0.43 at 1, and 4 weeks (P > 0.05) and significantly to 1.24 +/- 0.45 and 1.18 +/- 0.44 at 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, after treatment (P < 0.05). None of the patients in both groups experienced injection- or surgery-related complications or any obvious systemic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term results suggest that phacoemulsification with i.v.t. bevacizumab safely reduces macular edema and improves visual acuity for cataract and CSME in diabetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: