Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The equilibrium constant for the reaction CH2(COOH)2 + I3− ⇆ CHI(COOH)2 + 2I− + H+, measured spectrophotometrically at 25°C and ionic strength 1.00M (NaClO4), is (2.79 ± 0.48) × 10−4M2. Stopped‐flow kinetic measurements at 25°C and ionic strength 1.00M with [H+] = (2.09‐95.0) × 10−3M and [I−] = (1.23‐26.1) × 10−3M indicate that the rate of the forward reaction is given by (k1[I2] + k3[I3−]) [HOOCCH2COO−] + (k2[I2] + k4[I3−]) [CH(COOH)2] + k5[H+] [I3−] [CH2(COOH)2]. The values of the rate constants k1‐k5 are (1.21 ± 0.31) × 102, (2.41 ± 0.15) × 101, (1.16 ± 0.33) × 101, (8.7 ± 4.5) × 10−1M−1·sec−1, and (3.20 ± 0.56) × 101M−2·sec−1, respectively. The rate of enolization of malonic acid, measured by the bromine scavenging technique, is given by ken[CH2(COOH)2], with ken = 2.0 × 10−3 + 1.0 × 10−2 [CH2(COOH)2]. An intramolecular mechanism, featuring a six‐member cyclic transition state, is postulated to account for the results on the enolization of malonic acid. The reactions of the enol, enolate ion, and protonated enol with iodine and/or triodide ion are proposed to account for the various rate terms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leopold et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: