Key result
Improved regression models incorporating breathing frequency and percentile points over a 60-second window reduced minute ventilation estimation error by about 43%, achieving a mean percentage error below 7.5%.
Effect estimate: mean percentage error <7.5%
Improved regression models using wearable sensor belts can accurately estimate minute ventilation during physical activity with a mean percentage error below 7.5%.
May enable wearable ventilation monitoring during activity; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
Non-invasive estimation of minute ventilation is important for quantifying the intensity of physical activity of individuals. In this paper, several improved regression models are presented, based on the measurement of chest and abdomen movements from sensor belts worn by subjects (n = 50) engaged in 14 types of physical activity. Five linear models involving a combination of 11 features were developed, and the effects of different model training approaches and window sizes for computing the features were investigated. The performance of the models was evaluated using experimental data collected during the physical activity protocol. The predicted minute ventilation was compared to the criterion ventilation measured using a bidirectional digital volume transducer housed in a respiratory gas exchange system. The results indicate that the inclusion of breathing frequency and the use of percentile points instead of interdecile ranges over a 60 s window size reduced error by about 43%, when applied to the classical two-degrees-of-freedom model. The mean percentage error of the minute ventilation estimated for all the activities was below 7.5%, verifying reasonably good performance of the models and the applicability of the wearable sensing system for minute ventilation estimation during physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2011) studied this question. Improved regression models based on chest and abdomen movements vs. Criterion ventilation measured using a bidirectional digital volume transducer was evaluated on Minute ventilation estimation error (mean percentage error <7.5%). Improved regression models incorporating breathing frequency and percentile points over a 60-second window reduced minute ventilation estimation error by about 43%, achieving a mean percentage error below 7.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: