Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Asymmetric and symmetric chevron patterns are analyzed using a continuum model which modified P. K. George’s original model by assuming a uniform magnetization within each block and taking periodic structure for simulating practical propagation patterns. The potential well contours are illustrated over drive field phase of 360°. The potential well dependence on drive field phase angles for small bubble sizes at several points traversing the pattern gap clarifies the gap-tolerance differences between asymmetric and symmetric chevron patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsutera et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: