Key result
The sit-up test demonstrated substantial day-to-day reliability for systolic (ICC 0.79) and diastolic (ICC 0.92) blood pressure changes in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Why the study?
Does the sit-up test reliably measure blood pressure responses in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury?
Observational (n=8)
No
Does the sit-up test reliably measure blood pressure responses in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury?
The sit-up test is a reliable bedside assessment for orthostatic hypotension in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable sit-up test BP responses support bedside orthostatic assessment in SCI; larger studies needed before routine adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the day-to-day reliability of blood pressure responses during a sit-up test in individuals with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Within-subject, repeated measures design. SETTING: Community outpatient assessments at a research laboratory at the University of British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Five men and three women with traumatic SCI (age: 31 ± 6 years; C4-T11; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A-B; 1-17 years post-injury). OUTCOME MEASURE: Maximum change in systolic (ΔSBP) and diastolic (ΔDBP) blood pressure upon passively moving from a supine to seated position. RESULTS: The average values for ΔSBP were -11 ± 13 mmHg (range -38 to 3 mmHg) for visit 1, and -12 ± 8 mmHg (range -26 to -1 mmHg) for visit 2. The average values for ΔDBP were -9 ± 8 mmHg (range -21 to 0 mmHg) for visit 1, and -13 ± 8 mmHg (range -29 to -3 mmHg) for visit 2. The ΔSBP demonstrated substantial reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.79 (P = 0.006; 95% CI 0.250-0.953), while the ΔDBP demonstrated almost perfect reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 (P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.645-0.983). The smallest detectable differences in ΔSBP and ΔDBP were 7 mmHg and 6 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure responses to the sit-up test are reliable in individuals with SCI, which supports its implementation as a practical bedside assessment for orthostatic hypotension in this at risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Currie et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Traumatic spinal cord injury (n=8). Sit-up test vs. Visit 1 vs Visit 2 was evaluated on Day-to-day reliability of maximum change in systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) upon passively moving from a supine to seated position (ICC 0.79, 95% CI 0.250-0.953, p=0.006). The sit-up test demonstrated substantial day-to-day reliability for systolic (ICC 0.79) and diastolic (ICC 0.92) blood pressure changes in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: