Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
trans-4,4′(N,N′-Dimethylpyridinium)ethylene [trans-(1)] and cis-4,4′(N,N′-dimethylpyridinium)ethylene [cis-1] form with 2,7-dichlorofluorescein [DCF2−, (2)] donor–acceptor complexes of 1:1 stoichiometry [K(trans-1)=14 000 M−1 and K(cis-1)=300 M−1 in water]. The lower affinity of cis-1 to form the donor–acceptor complex with DCF2−, (2), is attributed to the non-planar structure of cis-1 (tilt-angle between the pyridinium rings=26°). The solid-state structure of the complex between DCF2− and trans-1 indicates alternate stacking of donor and acceptor units with an inter-layer spacing of 3·4 Å. Solubilization of the crystalline DCF2− and trans-1 complex in water or dimethylformamide (DMF) results in the initial formation of a non-symmetric complex where a trans-1 unit is inter-layered between two DCF2− components, and a second trans-1 unit is located externally to the supramolecular assembly and participates in charge neutralization [(DCF2−)2 · · · trans-1/trans-1]. The primary non-symmetrical complex is thermally transformed to a themodynamically stable symmetric complex where the DCF2− and trans-1 form a sandwich-type layered assembly [DCF2− · · · trans-1]. The structural features of the complexes were characterized by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The kinetics of the transformation of the [(DCF2−)2 · · · trans-1/trans-1] complex to the [DCF2− · · · trans-1] assembly was spectroscopically characterized in DMF (k=0·22 s−1 at 322 K; Ea=20 kcal mol−1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willner et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: