This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The CPS-Plus stem is designed for use with a proximal and distal stem centraliser. This in-vitro study examined the cement pressurisation achieved during insertion of the CPS-Plus femoral stem into a model femur. Cement pressures were measured at proximal, mid and distal stem levels. Pressures were recorded during insertion of the CPS-Plus stem with both proximal and distal centralisers and compared with those achieved when only a distal centraliser was used with digital occlusion of the proximal femur. The CPS-Plus with a proximal centraliser generated significantly greater cement pressures than the CPS-Plus without a proximal centraliser at proximal and mid-stem regions. The use of a proximal stem centraliser may improve the cement-bone interdigitation and shear strength at the cement-bone interface, particularly in the region of the proximal femur.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gozzard et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: