Two integrating techniques for measuring ambient NO2 were evaluated. Both techniques involved quantitative collection of NO2 in a reagent coated cartridge, specifically triethanolamine (TEA)-coated silica gel and diphenyl-amine (DPA)-coated Florisil. The evaluation of these techniques consisted of laboratory and field studies. The laboratory studies of the TEA method indicated collection and reaction efficiencies of 100 and 90%, respectively. A positive interference occurred when O3 and NO were passed through the cartridge simultaneously. PAN was found to produce a 67% positive interference. The ambient concentrations determined using the TEA method were approximately a factor of two higher than those determined using TDLAS. For the DPA method the collection and reaction efficiencies were determined to be 100 and 64%, respectively. O3 produced a negative interference by reacting with the NO2-DPA products. PAN produced a 42% positive interference. A regression of the DPA versus TDLAS determined ambient NO2 concentrations yielded a slope of .91±.08 (r2=0.990.). Neither method was found suitable for network use in its present form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedley et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: