This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
During early postnatal development, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling undergoes a functional switch from excitation to inhibition, driven by age-dependent shifts in intracellular chloride concentrations ([Cl⁻] i ).In the retina, starburst amacrine cells (SACs) are pivotal for establishing direction-selective circuitry.However, the molecular mechanisms and the precise timing of the reversal potential of GABA-induced currents (E GABA ) shift in mouse SACs remain to be fully elucidated.We investigated the maturation of GABA responsiveness and chloride homeostasis in mouse SACs during the neonatal period.Ca 2+ imaging in dissociated retinal neurons revealed that the application of GABA markedly increased intracellular Ca 2+ concentrations in SACs on postnatal day (P) 0-P2, whereas these excitatory responses were largely absent by P7-P9.Gramicidin-perforated patch recordings showed that E GABA underwent a significant hyperpolarizing shift with development, accompanied by a marked decrease in [Cl⁻] i .Immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated a developmental decline in Na + -K + -2Cl⁻ co-transporter (NKCC1) expression and the concomitant up-regulation of K + -Cl⁻ cotransporter (KCC2) in SACs.Consistent with these expression patterns, the pharmacological inhibition of NKCC1 or KCC2 selectively changed E GABA in a stagedependent manner.Collectively, these results demonstrate a developmentally regulated GABAergic switch in SACs orchestrated by coordinated changes in chloride transporter expression, providing insights into the physiological maturation of the retinal circuitry underlying direction selectivity.Highlights GABA signaling in SACs shifts from excitatory to inhibitory during development. E GABA hyperpolarizes with age due to a marked decrease in [Cl⁻] i . Reciprocal NKCC1 and KCC2 regulation drives chloride dynamics in maturing SACs. These shifts provide a mechanistic basis for retinal circuitry maturation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishii et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: